Rather than doing surgical stuff on the main daw. as opposed to taking a razor blade to one of my two-inch tapes.
I've always thought of and worked with Sound Forge (and would do so with Wavelab if Steinberg happens to someday give a copy to me free) as for doing stuff on like I would do in turning to the two-track tape machine for specialized subbounce edits. I use Sound Forge CONSTANTLY back and forth with Cubase, and I don't master any of my own music. Mostly because I've been using Sound Forge since the previous century and to me, both were aiming for the same market. More accurate editing? I'm not getting this one.
WAVELAB 7 VS WAVELAB ELEMENTS SOFTWARE
What is Error detection? Is that if you play a bad note the software tells you? Perhaps you should let those ME's know that they live in the past.wow lots of useful stuff. Perhaps you should let those ME's know that they live in the past. These are the main functions that I use what are not in C9.5. Set up the parameters and save 15 individual. wav file that contains for example 15 songs. Ever want to hear only the differences between 2 compressors or EQs? Create a delta file and listen only to the differences.Similar to when things don't null.ġ4. Wavelab-Cubase integration (still not as nice as it was before Cubase SX but do-able)ġ3. Importing Audio CDs then data integration via ww web.ġ2. Spectrum editing, a completely different approach.ġ1.
Metering tools that go far beyond Cubaseġ0. Audio Montage for assembly, effects, and CD error checks.ĩ. Batch processing, conversion & renamingĨ. I bet steinberg doesn't mind the revenue even though they should be honest with customers that it is indeed redundant.Oh really? How are these "redundant?"Ĥ. Some people just live in the past so they keep releasing it. There really is no need for Wavelab at this point.
0 kommentar(er)
